What is the difference between traditional standardized testing and authentic assessment? Describe how computers can be used for both. Which do you feel is a better use of computers? Describe examples from the readings or from your own experiences how
computers can be used effectively for assessment, and/or how to effectively assess the work students do via the computer.
Traditional standardized testing tends to narrow curriculum for low income school districts
because so much time is spent teaching to the test. Standardized tests tend to be
culturally biased for English language learners and the methods used to hide these kids' test scores tend to marginalize these kids and force them out of the
system which is counter to the
expressed goal of
NCLB. Authentic assessment on the other hand actually measures how much a student has learned and tends to factor out uninstructed factors such as poverty. Additionally, students become involved in the assessment process and take ownership of
their learning. Students are realistically engage in authentic learning processes that cannot be measured by a standardized test.
Computers can be used for standardized testing or authentic assessment. Simply put a student can do everything on a computer that a paper and pencil test requires. Unfortunately, using a computer for standardized testing is a massive waste of the power of the computer in the classroom. The computer is much more
effeciently used for projects such as the
International Students project in
Cummins chapter 3 regarding immigrants rights. Corresponding with elected officials and parents in both English and their native tongues is far more authentic than any canned standardized test. The text rich environment of cyberspace and the ability of students to do so much research is a better use of computer time. The ability to save multiple drafts of writing samples for example really allows teachers to provide feedback and allow assessors, teachers, parents and the students monitor their academic growth over time. Realistic projects focusing on real issues contributes so much more to academic language proficiency and it is
measurable over time quite easily with technology. Multiple assessment forms allow teachers to teach and students to learn without
pigeon holing students into narrow
curriculum's required by standardized testing.